Social Change And The 21st Century Classroom - 1464 Words

While 21st Century learning and teaching is always changing, it is as dynamic as the world around us. There are many factors including globalisation, social change and technology, which are driving changes in education, with a variety of positive and negative impacts on teaching and learning in the 21st Century. With ongoing changes in teaching practices, which in turn changes the attitudes of today’s teachers and learners. A 21st century classroom is a productive environment where the teachers are the facilitators of the students learning. There are many characteristics however, which segregate a 21st century classroom from that of previous centuries. These can include active learning, student-centric, adaptive learning, invitational environment, rules and procedures, respect, responsibility, performance based assessments and collaborative learning. The practices of traditional classrooms were no longer effective and teachers today engage their students in learning by providi ng effective instructions with a variety of methods while following different pedagogical approaches (Saxena, 2016). There are three factors that are driving these educational changes; globalisation, social change, and technology, all of which have both positive and negative impacts on today’s education. (182 out of 200) Carnoy (1999) has suggested that the direct impact of globalisation on both curriculum and pedagogy in the classroom in most countries had been minimal. The spread of education due toShow MoreRelatedCurrent Force That Impact Curriculum Design And Program1207 Words   |  5 Pagescurriculum design and program in the 21st century education, and developing an internationally-minded learner in a globalized era. Technology is manoeuvred into our everyday life, and it is evolving rapidly which urge educators to redefine the students’ potentials, and learning to know will never be the same. Technology calls for a change in learning and teaching for the 21st century education. The vast change and innovation of new technologies offer change in people’s understanding and perceivingRead MoreInstructional Planning For Learner Development Essay1313 Words   |  6 Pagesbe familiar with the Program Learning Outcome (PLO) and use them daily with the classroom environment. PLO 1 Instructional Planning for Learner Development Instructional Planning for Learner Development constitute the primary (PLO). This skill requires teachers to â€Å"design appropriate and challenging learning experiences informed by analysis of how learners develop individually across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical patterns to promote student learning and growth†(PLO 2014)Read MoreCritical Thinking And Problem Solving Skills1648 Words   |  7 Pagesand most importantly; the evolution and role of technology. Learners within the 21st Century are experiencing an education where they are taught to collaboratively communicate and construct new understandings, while acquiring higher order thinking skills to apply beyond the classroom environment. This essay will examine pedagogies and theories regarding the impact upon the quality of education within the 21st Century through the use of digital technology. By exploring research based on the integrationRead More21st Century Classrooms and Learners Essay1 560 Words   |  7 Pages21st Century Classrooms and Learners Defining a 21st Century Classroom The term, 21st century classroom, might at first thought, seem easy to define; however, as one looks deeper, the simplicity of a definition seems at best, a challenge. Is a 21st century classroom one which houses a variety of technologies readily available to the teacher and students? Or, as might seem obvious, one in which the teacher and students are capable of utilizing the technology? On the contrary, it appearsRead MoreThe Importance Of Competencies For The 21st Century981 Words   |  4 Pages21st Century Skills The importance of competencies for the 21st century has led to fundamental questions about to what extent we provide the necessary knowledge base for children and youth to be competent in contemporary and future societies (Voogt et al., 2013). It is obvious that not only learners, but also teachers need to acquire 21st century competencies as well as become competent in supporting 21st century learning. Teachers need to be prepared for new pedagogical approaches that fit theRead MoreDigital Literacy Is A Continuous Learning Process785 Words   |  4 Pagesstudents is ever evolving and changing. In order to become more confident in my 21st Century skills, I must commit my way of learning to that of a digital native. Technology and its intricacies must become so ingrained in my daily routine that it becomes natural. Digital literacy is a continual learning process. Knowing this, I must be willing to adapt and change my way of teaching from 20th Century skills to 21st Century ski lls. New Definition of Literacy â€Å"Literacy has expanded from the notionsRead MoreWhy We Need The 21st Century993 Words   |  4 PagesAnyone studying need 21st century abilities to be fruitful. It s energizing to trust that we live in times that are revolutionary to the point that they request new and diverse capacities. The aptitudes understudies need in the 21st century are relevant today as they were 20 years ago. Critical thinking has been a part of the human advancement all through history, from the improvement of ahead of schedule devices, to horticultural headways, to the innovation of antibodies, to land and oceanRead MoreThe New Industrial Revolution And The Digital Age968 Words   |  4 Pageserecting a barrier to the outside world, schools that embrace the Digital Age and more importantly, provide stakeholders equitable access to a connected world, open spaces of possibility inside classrooms. Establishing a culture of where individuals think deeply about their work is a hallmark of a 21st Century school district. A crucial role the Director of Curriculum and Instruction is fostering an organizational climate where stakeholders are imbued with a sense of agency. The Director of CurriculumRead MoreHow Theories Of Education Have Changed Thought The Years1647 Words   |  7 Pages â€Æ' In this paper I will show my research on how theories of education have changed thought the years and how teachers and students adapt to these changes. With the changes in multicultural classrooms and how students with disabilities have rights in public education. All early childhood theories have changed so much though the years based on a diverse multicultural world and new laws to protect students, have been put into place to aid these children. Research that was taken backRead MoreTeaching Strategies For The 21st Century Student1323 Words   |  6 PagesEveryday there are changes that are made in technology. With so many changes occurring in this technological society, it is important as educators that we consistently prepare and incorporate teaching strategies essential to educating the 21st century student. The 21st century student being that of a technically savvy one who is ready to take on the world. Our main objective is to create a positive learning environment for all students regardless of their learning abilities, while preparing them

Famous Management Journals Free Essays

RESEARCH WORSHOP ASSIGNMENT # 04 According to the subject classification of your discipline print the followings: ? List the journals in your discipline ? List of approved journals by HEC ? List of journals in your area for ISI Thomson list ? List of some selected journals with some impact factor MPhil Human Resource Management SUBMITTED ON: 2nd March, 2012 Discipline Chosen: Management Area Chosen: HRM Journal Stated (Management): 141 HRM Journal as per ISI Thomson List: 110 Impact factor as per 2010 SERIAL NO: |NAME OF JOURNAL |3-YEAR IMPACT FACTOR |5-YEAR IMPACT FACTOR |HRM JOURNAL IN ISI | | |(MANAGEMENT) | | |THOMSON LIST | |1 |ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS |5. 440 |5. 342 |? | |2 |ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL |5. We will write a custom essay sample on Famous Management Journals or any similar topic only for you Order Now 250 |10. 779 |? | |3 |ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING EDUCATION |2. 33 |3. 333 | | |4 |ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES |2. 470 |2. 500 |? | |5 |ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW |6. 720 |11. 657 |? | |6 |ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY |3. 684 |7. 539 |? | |7 |ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-A RESEARCH ANNUAL |0. 43 |0. 636 | | |8 |ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT-A RESEARCH ANNUAL | | | | |9 |AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | | |? | |10 |AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | | |? | |11 |ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES |0. 18 | |? | |12 |ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |3. 355 | |? | |13 |ASIAN BUSINESS MANAGEMENT |0. 610 | |? | |14 |AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |0. 469 | |? | |15 |AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | | |? |16 |BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |0. 525 | |? | |17 |BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | | |? | |18 |BRITISH JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE COUNSELLING |0. 403 |0. 646 |? | |19 |BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS |1. 033 |1. 529 |? | |20 |BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |1. 85 |2. 631 |? | |21 |CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW |1. 706 |2. 524 |? | |22 |CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES |0. 714 |0. 695 |? | |23 |CAREER DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY |1. 345 |1. 406 |? | |24 |CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES |0. 750 |0. 39 |? | |25 |CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE | | |? | |26 |CROSS CULTURAL MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | | |? | |27 |CULTURE AND ORGANIZATION | | |? | |28 |DECISION SCIENCES |2. 233 |3. 937 |? |29 |Â  EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | | | | |30 |EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS |0. 690 |0. 926 |? | |31 |EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT |0. 220 | |? | |32 |EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY |1. 489 |2. 682 |? |33 |EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | | |? | |34 |FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT | | | | |35 |GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION |0. 733 |1. 373 |? | |36 |GROUP ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT |2. 415 |2. 710 |? | |37 |GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION |1. 48 |1. 313 |? | |38 | HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW |1. 881 |2. 671 |? | |39 |HUMAN ORGANIZATION | | |? | |40 |HUMAN PERFORMANCE |0. 636 |1. 962 |? | |41 |HUMAN RELATIONS |1. 701 |2. 95 |? | |42 |HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY |0. 475 | |? | |43 |HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |1. 341 |1. 825 |? | |44 |HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | | |? | |45 |HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW |2. 796 | |? |46 |INDUSTRIAL LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW |1. 071 |1. 607 |? | |47 |INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE| | |? | | |AND PRACTICE | | | | |48 |INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS |1. 311 |1. 948 |? |49 |Â  INDUTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT | | | | |50 |INFORMATION MANAGEMENT | | | | |51 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT | | |? | |52 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |0. 869 |1. 610 |? |53 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION | | |? | |54 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS | | |? | |55 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS |2. 641 |4. 304 |? | | 56 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER |0. 429 |0. 752 |? | |57 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT |1. 12 |2. 792 | | |58 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT | | | | |59 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION ASSESMENT | | |? | |60 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT |0. 859 |1. 361 |? | |61 |INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT | | |? |62 |INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION | | |? | |63 |INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL | | |? | |64 |INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES |0. 848 |0. 798 |? | |65 |JOURNAL FOR EAST EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT STUDIES |0. 781 | |? | |66 |JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE |1. 82 | |? | |67 |JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY |3. 977 |6. 730 |? | |68 |Â  JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY | | |? | |69 |JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING |1. 672 |2. 409 |? | |70 |JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT |3. 66 | | | |71 |JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT | | | | |72 |JOURNAL OF BUSI NESS RESEARCH |1. 773 |2. 484 |? | |73 |JOURNAL OF CAREER ASSESSMENT |1. 639 |1. 986 |? | |74 |JOURNAL OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT |1. 50 |1. 125 |? | |75 |Â  JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY | | |? | |76 |JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT |0. 623 |0. 894 |? | |77 |JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY |1. 123 |1. 656 | | |78 |JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED |2. 237 |2. 09 |? | |79 |JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION | | |? | |80 |JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS |0. 430 | |? | |81 |JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES |4. 184 |5. 539 |? | |82 |JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMPENSATION | | |? |83 |JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING | | | | |84 |JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT |1. 298 | |? | |85 |JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |3. 758 |6. 210 |? | |86 |JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION |0. 425 | |? | |87 |JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY |1. 83 |1. 600 |? | |88 |JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES |3. 817 |4. 684 |? | |89 |JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL P SYCHOLOGY |2. 150 | |? | |90 |JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY |0. 882 |2. 259 |? | |91 |JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT |5. 093 |6. 29 | | |92 |JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR |2. 351 |4. 411 |? | |93 |JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT |0. 963 |1. 222 |? | |94 |JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT |0. 650 |0. 944 |? | |95 |JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | | |? |96 |JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT | | | | |97 |JOURNAL OF PURCHASING AND SUPPLY MANAGEMENT | | | | |98 |JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | | | | |99 |JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT |5. 853 |11. 06 | | |100 |JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY |1. 102 |1. 481 | | |101 |JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR |2. 604 |3. 928 | | |102 |JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS | | |? | |103 |KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH PRACTICE |0. 55 | | | |104 |LEADERSHIP |0. 535 |1. 381 |? | |105 |LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY |2. 902 |4. 919 |? | |106 |Â  MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH | | | | |107 |MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW |2. 06 | |? | |108 |MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY | | | | |109 |MANAGEMENT DECISION |1. 078 | | | |110 |MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW |0. 882 | |? | |111 |MANAGEMENT SCIENCE |2. 221 |3. 66 |? | |112 |MIS QUARTERLY |5. 041 |9. 821 | | |113 |MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW |1. 452 |2. 317 |? | |114 |NEW TECHNOLOGY WORK AND EMPLOYMENT |0. 469 |1. 000 |? | |115 |OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE |3. 467 |3. 733 |? |116 |ORGANIZATION |1. 488 |2. 152 |? | |117 |ORGANIZATION ENVIRONMENT | | |? | |118 |ORGANIZATION SCIENCE |3. 800 |5. 838 |? | |119 |ORGANIZATION STUDIES |2. 339 | |? | |120 |ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES |2. 80 |3. 586 |? | |121 |ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS |0. 862 |0. 979 |? | |122 |ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS |4. 423 |5. 350 |? | |123 |PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY |3. 367 |6. 395 |? | |124 |PERSONNEL REVIEW |0. 446 |1. 74 |? | |125 |Â  PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT | | | | |126 |PUBLIC ADMINI STRATION |1. 292 |1. 938 |? | |127 |PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW |1. 295 |1. 387 |? | |128 |Â  PUBLIC PERFORMANCE AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW | | |? |129 |PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT |0. 200 |0. 479 |? | |130 |R D MANAGEMENT |1. 580 |2. 806 |? | |131 |RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR |4. 833 |5. 167 |? | |132 |REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION | | |? | |133 |REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION |0. 91 | |? | |134 |SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT |1. 108 | |? | |135 |SMALL GROUP RESEARCH |1. 148 |1. 888 | | |136 |SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT |0. 146 | | | |137 |STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL |3. 583 |6. 18 | | |138 |STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION |2. 727 | | | |139 |TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT BUSINESS EXCELLENCE | | | | |140 |WORK AND OCCUPATIONS |0. 857 |1. 682 |? | |141 |WORK AND STRESS |3. 071 |4. 71 |? | |TOTAL |141 |99 |75 |110 | HEC RECOGNIZED JOURNALS: 10 DISCIPLINE: MANAGEMENT 1. Business Review 2. Journal of Behavioral Sciences 3. Journal of Gender Social Issues 4. Journal of Independent Studies and Research? Management 5. Journal of Quality Technology Management 6. Pakistan Business Review 7. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research 8. Pakistan Journal of Psychology 9. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 10. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences How to cite Famous Management Journals, Essay examples

Climate Change Consequences for Stakeholders-Samples for Student

Question: Discuss about the Climate Change and its Consequences for Stakeholders. Answer: Literature Review Carbon or Voluntary Disclosure by Companies Chiuand Wang (2015) indicated that CDP works for decreasing greenhouse gas emissions of the companies with reducing the risk of climate change. These researchers also indicated that in the year 2015, 822 investors have more than US$95 trillion within assets backed CDPs climate change information request. Guenther et al. (2016) had a different opinion regarding greenhouse gas information gradually disclosed by the organizations of the country that is listed. This is also carried out by means of two different communication channels like corporate report and the project of carbon disclosure. From the stakeholder theory perspective, it is indicated that the greenhouse gas amounts are gradually decreased within the corporate reports within the CDP (Hartmann, Perego and Young 2013). Stakeholder Theory According to Lee, Park and Klassen (2015) stakeholder theory is indicated as an organizational management theory as well as voluntary carbon disclosures that is associated with maintaining morals and values of managing all the companys stakeholders. These researchers also indicated that this theory makes sure that an organizations intention is to develop stakeholders value (Lovell 2010). Due to these causes, a company must take into account its consumers, suppliers, communities and shareholders. In accordance, Jaggi et al. (2017) stated that stakeholder engagement is a two-way theory of communication which focuses on maintaining information exchange concerning the issues related with domestic sustainability. It is understood to be a dialogue which supports the council in deciding the choices that will be acceptable to the local community. Figure 1: Stakeholder Theory (Source: Liesen et al.2015) Carbon Disclosure Determinants within Corporate Real Estate Companies Yunus, Elijido-Ten and Abhayawansa (2016) stated that financial market aspect pressure, social pressures, institutional along with economic pressure are important CDP determinants in the corporate real estate organizations. In contrast, Li et al. (2016) indicated that taking into account these aspects the organizations are explaining the climate change effect in the economies which has an intention to deal with efficient disclosure of corporate carbon emission. Conceptual Model The conceptual framework is developed below in order to answer the research hypotheses and question. It also centers on sustainable reporting process and carbon disclosure which has integrated factors of reporting, planning and sustainability accounting (Kalu, Buang and Aliagha 2016). The strategy of integrated reporting as well as sustainability accounting considers a comprehensive analysis of the engagement extent and nature within every phrase of accounting and reporting process. Recognition of vital shareholders is important in order to understand the individuals that are contributing to reporting and accounting process as well as determining salience of stakeholders (Clarkson et al. 2015). The conceptual framework elaborates numerous proxies related with theories indicated in the figure below as well as their effect on voluntary carbon disclosure. The framework also signifies the carbon disclosures in the corporate real estate companies. The theoretical framework will explain th e relationship between the independent and dependent variable such as target of voluntary minimization and stakeholder power. Implementation of emission reduction targets are highly associated with carbon disclosure and greatly impacts stakeholder interaction in consideration to asymmetric and imperfect information. Figure 2: Conceptual Framework of the Research (Source: Smith, Morreale and Mariani 2018) Hypothesis The hypotheses those are meant to be tested through accomplishment of this research is explained under: H1: There is a positive relationship between stakeholder power and voluntary reduction target H2: Low powered organizations are deemed to respond properly to pressure of the powerful stakeholders H3: Suppliers of powerful organizationstake into accountadoption ofchallenging emissions targets at the time their customer declares a sustainability commitment Proxy Measures for Theoretical Constructs: Theoretical Construct Proxy measure Dependent variable, independent, or Control Variable Source Research centres pertaining to voluntary disclosure- stakeholder theory The organisations having limited power are probable to act as per the interests of their shareholders under pressure Target of voluntary minimisation will be the dependent variable here Disclosure of target within CDP Moral responsibility of the organisations regarding the effects on stakeholders If the customers desire for commitment in sustainability, the suppliers of powerful organisations would impose greater emission targets Stakeholder power will be the independent variable here Data will be attained by assessing the relative industrial size and Porters five forces framework Research Method: Research Approach: Since the researcher will take into quantitative research approach to evaluate the responses accumulated from the respondents. The positive research approach will be deployed in evaluating that climate change has large effects on the stakeholders of the corporate organisations (Taylor, Bogdan and DeVault 2015). Along with this, there is direct association between the analysis of quantitative data and positivism research philosophy. The data accumulated will be assessed through the previous trends and current models coupled with the established facts (Mackey and Gass 2015). Thus is the main reason due to which deductive research approach is considered as the most effective approach to accomplish rightful findings from the research. Data Collection Technique: In order to assess the effects of climate change on the stakeholders, there will be employment of primary as well as secondary data (Lewis 2015). The quantitative data denotes the segment of information, which could be assessed to accumulate information in relation to the research findings. It is taken into consideration greater amount of data and size of sample for its evaluation. Due to this reason, appropriate respondents will be chosen to participate in the process of survey for achieving suitable findings related to practice of stakeholder theory along with dealing with the issues of accounting (Flick 2015). Sampling and Sample Size: In order to carry out with the research, the method of simple random sampling will be used for surveying the corporate professionals. This method is selected primarily because it provides equivalent opportunities to the participants of being selected in the process of survey (Vaioleti 2016). For this specific research, 42 organisations will be chosen carrying out its business operations in UK to interview their shareholders and managers along with assessment of their responses. Data Analysis Technique: The data accumulated for this specific research to assess the effects of climate change on the stakeholders of the corporate organisations will necessitate the use of greatly effective data analysis along with statistical techniques. This is needed for accomplishing appropriate and reliable findings from this specific research. Along with this, it enables to sustain the analysis and reliability of the accumulated data (Silverman 2016). Graphs and tables will be used for representing the quantitative information collected from the corporate professionals. As a result, it will become easier to interpret the accumulated data in an effective fashion (Wegener et al. 2013). Tools like Microsoft Excel will be utilised to assess the collected data. This will be beneficial for transferring the participants opinion into percent form, which would help in estimating the overall viewpoint of the participants (Brinkmann 2014). References: Brinkmann, S., 2014. Interview. InEncyclopedia of critical psychology(pp. 1008-1010). Springer New York. Chiu, T.K. and Wang, Y.H., 2015. Determinants of social disclosure quality in Taiwan: An application of stakeholder theory.Journal of business ethics,129(2), pp.379-398. Clarkson, P.M., Li, Y., Pinnuck, M. and Richardson, G.D., 2015. The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme.European Accounting Review,24(3), pp.551-580. Flick, U., 2015.Introducing research methodology: A beginner's guide to doing a research project. Sage. Guenther, E., Guenther, T., Schiemann, F. and Weber, G., 2016. Stakeholder relevance for reporting: explanatory factors of carbon disclosure.Business Society,55(3), pp.361-397. Hartmann, F., Perego, P. and Young, A., 2013. Carbon accounting: Challenges for research in management control and performance measurement.Abacus,49(4), pp.539-563. Jaggi, B., Allini, A., Macchioni, R. and Zagaria, C., 2017. The factors motivating voluntary disclosure of carbon information: Evidence based on Italian listed companies.Organization Environment, p.1086026617705282. Kalu, J.U., Buang, A. and Aliagha, G.U., 2016. Determinants of voluntary carbon disclosure in the corporate real estate sector of Malaysia.Journal of environmental management,182, pp.519-524. Lee, S.Y., Park, Y.S. and Klassen, R.D., 2015. Market responses to firms' voluntary climate change information disclosure and carbon communication.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,22(1), pp.1-12. Lewis, S., 2015. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Health promotion practice,16(4), pp.473-475. Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X. and Ning, L., 2016. Environmental legitimacy, green innovation, and corporate carbon disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100.Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-16. Liesen, A., Hoepner, A.G., Patten, D.M. and Figge, F., 2015. Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe.Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal,28(7), pp.1047-1074. Lovell, H.C., 2010. Governing the carbon offset market.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: climate change,1(3), pp.353-362. Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M., 2015.Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge. Silverman, D. ed., 2016.Qualitative research. Sage. Smith, J.A., Morreale, M. and Mariani, M.E., 2018. Climate change disclosure: Moving towards a brave new world.Capital markets law journal,3(4), pp.469-485. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. and DeVault, M., 2015.Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. John Wiley Sons. Vaioleti, T.M., 2016. Talanoa research methodology: A developing position on Pacific research.Waikato Journal of Education,12(1). Wegener, M., Elayan, F.A., Felton, S. and Li, J., 2013. Factors influencing corporate environmental disclosures.Accounting Perspectives,12(1), pp.53-73. Yunus, S., Elijido-Ten, E. and Abhayawansa, S., 2016. Determinants of carbon management strategy adoption: Evidence from Australias top 200 publicly listed firms.Managerial Auditing Journal,31(2), pp.156-179